Intelligence Dashboard

What's the state of play - and what to do next

A live view over the SearchScore Knowledge Operating System and its benchmark data. Every tile links into the method behind it. To see these numbers for your site, run a free audit.

Run a free audit Ask the Intelligence Engine

Benchmarks - how the average site scores

Anonymised aggregates from SearchScore's audited sample. All benchmarks →

13.5% Across 347,988 websites audited by SearchScore in August 2026, 13.5% block GPTBot in their robots.txt and 7.83% block OAI-SearchBot. Of the sites blocking GPTBot, 42.6% allow OpenAI search. 347,988 websites 68.2% Across the Q3 2026 SAVI index panel of 102,873 websites, weighted, 68.2% of websites publish no Organisation schema, the JSON-LD AI engines use to verify who is behind a site, and 55.7% publish no JSON-LD at all. 102,873 websites (Q3 2026 SAVI index panel, weighted) 72.4% In the Q3 2026 SAVI signal sample of 20,000 recent audits on the current engine (August 2026), 72.4% of websites publish no llms.txt, the emerging standard for describing key content directly to AI crawlers. 20,000 websites (Q3 2026 SAVI signal sample) 63.8% Nearly 2 in 3 scored audits fall below 50 out of 100 on the SearchScore GEO score, the line separating weak from workable AI visibility. SearchScore live audit corpus 0.022% Just 0.022% of scored audits reach a GEO score of 80 or above, the AI-Ready tier. SearchScore live audit corpus 45.24/100 Across the 102,873-site SAVI index panel (wave 1, 1 August 2026) the weighted mean GEO score is 45.24 out of 100, sitting below the 50 mark that separates weak from workable AI visibility. 102,873-site SAVI index panel 1,000,000+ The published SAVI corpus covers more than 850,000 website audits, each scored against 250+ signals across 8 weighted GEO categories. 1,000,000+ websites 52.8/100 A benchmark of more than 150 Greater London accountancy firms found an average GEO score of 52.8 out of 100, with only four firms scoring above 70. 150+ Greater London accountancy firms

Knowledge coverage

Depth of the method across the nine domains. Browse by domain →

Search Foundations 13 Technical SEO 111 Content Optimisation 119 Commercial SEO 33 Authority & Trust 61 GEO & AI Search 72 AI Visibility 48 Measurement & Intelligence 38 Automation & Operations 4

Top risks

The highest-severity problems to rule out first.

Critical Pages Not Indexed Critical No AI Citations High Organic Traffic Decline High AI Does Not Recommend Brand High Weak Authority High Poor Commercial Intent Coverage

Top opportunities

High-leverage capabilities to invest in next.

◈Capability Query Gap Optimisation ◈Capability Existing Asset Optimisation ◈Capability Technical Health Optimisation ◈Capability Content Opportunity Prioritisation ◈Capability Commercial Intent Optimisation ◈Capability Internal Link Architecture

Recommended next actions

DiagnoseDescribe your problem to the Intelligence EngineReasoning → ScoreRun an interactive auditAudit → MeasureGet your live SearchScoreFree audit → TrackMonitor visibility over timeTracker →

Method coverage

26
Frameworks
31
Patterns
52
Decisions
58
Guides
505
Total objects